Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 18;17:157. doi: 10.1186/s12944-018-0808-3

Table 4.

Effect of theaflavin and thearubigins and their combination based intervention on selected traits of normal and renal malfunctional rats at the termination of the study (56th day)

Parameters Base line values
(n = 1)
Treatments Post treatment values at termination of study
Control Study (Normal Rats)
Post treatment values at termination of study
Arginine induced renal malfunctional rats
Body weight (at the termination of study) 128 ± 10.25 T0 224.18 ± 10.25a 223 ± 9.61a
T1 212.14 ± 9.23d 213.10 ± 6.11c
T2 216.41 ± 8.56b 217.74 ± 5.61b
T3 213.12 ± 9.22c 214.17 ± 4.25c
TC (mg/dL) 77.80 ± 3.56 T0 85.14 ± 4.12a 86.31 ± 4.63a
T1 82.13 ± 3.25c 81.14 ± 2.12c
T2 84.15 ± 2.212b 82.99 ± 5.63b
T3 83.1 ± 3.14c 82.29 ± 4.25b
LDL-C (mg/dL) 26.56 ± 3.56 T0 27.10 ± 0.96a 33.36 ± 2.13a
T1 26.01 ± 1.01c 30.94 ± 1.22c
T2 26.65 ± 0.95b 32.20 ± 3.61b
T3 26.30 ± 1.02b 31.49 ± 2.81b
HDL-C (mg/dL) 32.56 ± 3.56 T0 38.45 ± 1.1 38.54 ± 2.36
T1 39.21 ± 0.96 39.70 ± 2.32
T2 39.01 ± 0.85 38.92 ± 1.09
T3 39.14 ± 0.89 39.64 ± 1.56
TG (mg/dL) 58.26 ± 3.56 69.45 ± 1.20a 67.15 ± 4.20
T1 67.12 ± 1.14c 64.96 ± 5.15
T2 68.01 ± 1.05b 65.20 ± 4.12
T3 67.65 ± 1.08c 65.13 ± 2.12
Glucose (mg/dL) 79.63 ± 3.72 T0 85.65 ± 2.2a 89.18 ± 6.14a
T1 83.15 ± 1.96b 84.70 ± 6.13b
T2 83.69 ± 1.12b 85.60 ± 3.20b
T3 82.38 ± 1.23c 83.98 ± 7.14b
Insulin μU/Ml 6.23 ± 0.56 T0 8.25 ± 0.01b 7.76 ± 0.22b
T1 8.91 ± 0.25a 8.06 ± 0.41a
T2 8.80 ± 0.31b 7.96 ± 0.52ab
T3 8.99 ± 0.21a 8.11 ± 0.12a
Serum Urea mg/Dl 32.56 ± 1.03 T0 26.14 ± 1.01a 37.83 ± 2.46a
T1 25.96 ± 1.04b 34.09 ± 2.56b
T2 26.01 ± 0.96a 34.95 ± 2.91b
T3 25.78 ± 0.88b 33.44 ± 1.45c
Serum creatinine (mg/dL) 1.01 ± 0.02 T0 0.719 ± 0.01 1.15 ± 0.03a
T1 0.715 ± 0.02 1.08 ± 0.01b
T2 0.716 ± 0.01 1.09 ± 0.021b
T3 0.701 ± 0.03 1.04 ± 0.05c
Serum glutathione (mg/L) 42.32 ± 1.02 T0 50.52 ± 1.01b 43.12 ± 3.01c
T1 52.99 ± 1.45ab 46.19 ± 2.56b
T2 52.14 ± 1.21ab 44.91 ± 4.14bc
T3 53.01 ± 1.24a 47.87 ± 4.12a
Malonialdehyde (MDA)
(mmol/L)
6.23 ± 0.59 T0 7.85 ± 0.14a 8.01 ± 0.21a
T1 6.23 ± 0.18b 6.78 ± 0.24c
T2 7.15 ± 0.12a 7.55 ± 0.01a
T3 6.85 ± 0.13ab 6.95 ± 0.42b
AST (IU/L) 6.23 ± 0.59 T0 7.85 ± 0.14a 8.01 ± 0.21a
T1 6.23 ± 0.18b 6.78 ± 0.24c
T2 7.15 ± 0.12a 7.55 ± 0.01a
T3 6.85 ± 0.13ab 6.95 ± 0.42b
ALT(IU/L) 6.23 ± 0.59 T0 7.85 ± 0.14a 8.01 ± 0.21a
T1 6.23 ± 0.18b 6.78 ± 0.24c
T2 7.15 ± 0.12a 7.55 ± 0.01a
T3 6.85 ± 0.13ab 6.95 ± 0.42b
ALP(IU/L) 6.23 ± 0.59 T0 7.85 ± 0.14a 8.01 ± 0.21a
T1 6.23 ± 0.18b 6.78 ± 0.24c
T2 7.15 ± 0.12a 7.55 ± 0.01a
T3 6.85 ± 0.13ab 6.95 ± 0.42b

T0: Group rely on Basic Experimental Diet

T1: Group rely on Basic Experimental Diet+ theaflavins supplementation @ 1 g

T2: Group rely on Basic Experimental Diet+ Thearubigins supplementation @ 1 g

T3: Group rely on Basic Experimental Diet+ Supplementation of theaflavins+ thearubigins @ 0.5 + 0.5 g, respectively

Values are mean ± SEM (n = 10)

One way anova was applied to check the overall behavior of the study parameter to elaborate the effect of treatments on selected parameter of rats at the termination of study. To evaluate the differences among the mean LSD test was applied. Values in same column within each parameter with different letters were significantly different from each other (p ≤ 0. 05)