Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Res Econ. 2017 May 31;72(1):1–32. doi: 10.1016/j.rie.2017.05.006

Table 15.

Estimation Results for Main Outcomes, Comparison to No Infant-Toddler Care, Age-30 Cohort

Within Reggio
With Parma
None BIC Full PSM KM DidPm KMPm
IQ Factor −0.20 −0.25 −0.29 −0.16 −0.28 0.24 −0.85
Unadjusted P- Value (0.13)* (0.07)** (0.04)*** (0.24) (0.04)*** (0.29) (0.00)***
Stepdown P- Value (0.63) (0.56) (0.24) (0.71) (0.31) (0.96) (0.00)***
Graduate from High School 0.01 −0.03 −0.06 −0.04 −0.01 −0.16 0.01
Unadjusted P- Value (0.92) (0.55) (0.29) (0.45) (0.84) (0.10)* (0.95)
Stepdown P- Value (0.96) (0.90) (0.73) (0.84) (0.98) (0.80) (0.99)
High School Grade −3.06 −3.48 −3.18 −3.03 −3.94 6.34 3.08
Unadjusted P- Value (0.05)** (0.04)*** (0.07)** (0.06)** (0.02)*** (0.31) (0.43)
Stepdown P- Value (0.45) (0.37) (0.22) (0.40) (0.22) (0.84) (0.97)
High School Grade (Standardized) −2.88 −3.67 −3.00 −3.38 −3.99 3.41 −2.26
Unadjusted P- Value (0.15) (0.07)** (0.15)* (0.09)** (0.06)** (0.44) (0.46)
Stepdown P- Value (0.58) (0.52) (0.43) (0.54) (0.35) (0.96) (0.97)
Max Edu: Lmversitv −0.14 −0.16 −0.19 −0.15 −0.17 −0.25 −0.22
Unadjusted P- Value (0.01)*** (0.00)*** (0.00)*** (0.02)*** (0.00)*** (0.05)*** (0.08)**
Stepdown P- Value (0.24) (0.14) (0.08)** (0.22) (0.02)*** (0.53) (0.55)
Employed 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.06 −0.04 0.09
Unadjusted P- Value (0.01)*** (0.01)*** (0.02)*** (0.01)*** (0.03)*** (0.64) (0.35)
Stepdown P- Value (0.50) (0.56) (0.27) (0.10)** (0.27) (0.99) (0.96)
Hours Worked Per Week 4.75 5.54 5.70 5.41 5.52 1.79 9.26
Unadjusted P- Value (0.00)*** (0.00)*** (0.00)*** (0.00)*** (0.00)*** (0.67) (0.04)***
Stepdown P- Value (0.21) (0.08)** (0.07)** (0.02)*** (0.02)*** (0.99) (0.38)
Married or Cohabitating 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.11 0.13 0.05 0.20
Unadjusted P- Value (0.10)* (0.13)* (0.12)* (0.22) (0.13)* (0.74) (0.15)
Stepdown P- Value (0.52) (0.56) (0.36) (0.71) (0.56) (0.99) (0.70)
Not Obese 0.15 0.12 0.09 0.14 0.09 0.19 0.01
Unadjusted P- Value (0.01)*** (0.05)*** (0.12)* (0.03)*** (0.17) (0.18) (0.94)
Stepdown P- Value (0.28) (0.49) (0.49) (0.27) (0.56) (0.82) (0.99)
Not Overweight 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.04 −0.03 0.23
Unadjusted P- Value (0.31) (0.58) (0.75) (0.50) (0.62) (0.83) (0.08)**
Stepdown P- Value (0.73) (0.90) (0.95) (0.84) (0.94) (0.99) (0.55)
Locus of Control – positive −0.03 −0.02 0.01 0.02 −0.02 0.12 −0.02
Unadjusted P- Value (0.77) (0.88) (0.90) (0.84) (0.84) (0.66) (0.93)
Stepdown P- Value (0.96) (0.90) (0.98) (0.84) (0.98) (0.99) (0.99)
Depression Score – positive −1.26 −1.31 −1.70 −1.28 −1.44 −5.21 −0.59
Unadjusted P- Value (0.16) (0.14)* (0.06)** (0.16) (0.13)* (0.00)*** (0.73)
Stepdown P- Value (0.63) (0.56) (0.18) (0.67) (0.56) (0.03)*** (0.99)
Volunteers −0.09 −0.08 −0.06 −0.10 −0.08 0.12 −0.42
Unadjusted P- Value (0.02)*** (0.03)*** (0.13)* (0.00)*** (0.04)*** (0.29) (0.00)***
Stepdown P- Value (0.50) (0.56) (0.58) (0.06)** (0.31) (0.94) (0.02)***
Ever Voted tor Municipal 0.23 0.18 0.11 0.22 0.16 0.13 0.48
Unadjusted P- Value (0.01)*** (0.02)*** (0.17) (0.01)*** (0.06)** (0.26) (0.00)***
Stepdown P- Value (0.11) (0.17) (0.40) (0.10)** (0.35) (0.94) (0.00)***
Ever Voted for Regional 0.23 0.20 0.15 0.23 0.19 0.17 0.55
Unadjusted P- Value (0.01)*** (0.01)*** (0.06)** (0.01)*** (0.03)*** (0.12)* (0.00)***
Stepdown P- Value (0.11) (0.14) (0.16) (0.09)** (0.27) (0.84) (0.00)***
Num. of Friends −3.62 −3.70 −4.22 −4.15 −3.63 −7.73 −2.36
Unadjusted P- Value (0.00)*** (0.00)*** (0.00)*** (0.00)*** (0.00)*** (0.08)** (0.13)*
Stepdown P- Value (0.08)** (0.07)** (0.04)*** (0.00)*** (0.01)*** (0.13) (0.70)
Trust Score −1.15 −1.16 −1.14 −1.24 −1.14 −1.64 −1.10
Unadjusted P- Value (0.00)*** (0.00)*** (0.00)*** (0.00)*** (0.00)*** (0.00)*** (0.03)***
Stepdown P- Value (0.00)*** (0.00)*** (0.04)*** (0.00)*** (0.00)*** (0.01)*** (0.29)

Note 1: This table shows the estimates of the coefficient for attending Reggio Approach infant-toddler centers from multiple methods. We compare people who attended both municipal infant-toddler centers and preschools (1,1) with people who only attended municipal preschools and no infant-toddler center (0,1). As in Section Column title indicates the corresponding control set and and model. None = within-Reggio Emilia OLS estimate with no control variables. BIC = within-Reggio Emilia OLS estimate with controls selected by Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and additional controls for male indicator and ITC attendance indicator. Full = within-Reggio Emilia OLS estimate with the full set of controls. PSM = within-Reggio Emilia propensity score matching estimation. KM = within-Reggio Emilia Epanechnikov kernel matching estimation. DidPm = difference-in-differences estimates of (Reggio (1,1) – Reggio (0,1)) – (Parma (1,1) – Parma (0,1)). PSMPm = propensity score matching estimation between Reggio (1,1) and Parma (0,1). KMPm = Epanechnikov kernel matching estimation between Reggio (1,1) and Parma (0,1). Note that comparison with Padova is not possible due to small sample size as specified in Table 12.

Note 2: Both unadjusted p-value and stepdown p-value are reported. ***, **, and * indicate significance of the coefficients at the 15%, 10%, and 5% levels respectively. Empty cells show that the estimation cannot be carried out for that outcome.