Skip to main content
. 2018 May 24;177(3):980–989. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00176

Table III. Drought stress phenotypes.

Data are presented as averages ± se. Days, Number of days under treatment conditions; N, replicates; E, transpiration. Asterisks indicate significance when comparing the wild type with the mutant using pairwise Student’s t test: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; and ***, P < 0.001.

Genotype Treatment Days N E Plant Height Dry Weight
L cm g
Wild type 100% 19 7 10.9 ± 0.4 120 ± 2.2 51.4 ± 1.6
ca1ca2 100% 19 7 11.4 ± 0.2 109 ± 2.6** 45.6 ± 1.0*
Wild type 80% 19 8 9.6 ± 0.3 118 ± 1.6 51.2 ± 1.1
ca1ca2 80% 19 8 9.7 ± 0.2 105 ± 2.4*** 44.6 ± 0.9***
Wild type 60% 18 8 7.8 ± 0.2 103 ± 1.4 46.9 ± 1.0
ca1ca2 60% 18 7 7.8 ± 0.1 86 ± 2.3*** 40.0 ± 0.7***
Wild type 40% 16 8 4.6 ± 0.1 76 ± 2.6 34.0 ± 0.9
ca1ca2 40% 16 7 4.8 ± 0.4 66 ± 3.1* 29.7 ± 1.4*
Wild type 20% 11 7 0.9 ± 0.2 61 ± 1.8 24.0 ± 0.8
ca1ca2 20% 11 7 1.1 ± 0.1 54 ± 1.0** 21.2 ± 0.4*