Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 19;9:2841. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05192-7

Table 1.

Discovery and optimization

graphic file with name 41467_2018_5192_Figa_HTML.gif
Entry Solvent (M) Acid (eq) Yield (%)a
1 CH2Cl2 (0.1) HCOOH (1.0) 35
2 CH2Cl2 (0.1) CH3COOH (1.0) 75
3 CH2Cl2 (0.1) CH3COOH (0.2) 31
4 CH2Cl2 (0.1) CH3COOH (1.2) 82 (78b)
5 CH2Cl2 (0.1) CH3COOH (2.0) 78
6 CH2Cl2 (0.2) CH3COOH (1.2) 80
7 CH2Cl2 (0.05) CH3COOH (1.2) 20
8 DCE (0.1) CH3COOH (1.2) 76
9 toluene (0.1) CH3COOH (1.2) 78
10 CH2Cl2 (0.1) diphenyl phosphate (1.2) <10
11 CH2Cl2 (0.1) camphorsulphonic acid (1.2) trace
12 CH2Cl2 (0.1) 4-nitrophenol (1.2) N.O.
13 CH2Cl2 (0.1) ZnCl2 (1.2) N.O.

Reactions were performed on 0.3 mmol of amide

N.O. not observed

aNMR yields with 1-bromo-2-methoxylnaphthlene as internal standard

bIsolated yield. DCE: 1,2-dichloroethane