Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 13;9:1563. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01563

Table 2.

Distribution of different mt-DNA profiles of S. cerevisiae in the six wineries (A, B, C, D, E, and F) in the same vintage.

Winery code
A B C D E F
mt-DNA profiles Isolation frequency (%) mt-DNA profiles Isolation frequency (%) mt-DNA profiles Isolation frequency (%) mt-DNA profiles Isolation frequency (%) mt-DNA profiles Isolation frequency (%) mt-DNA profiles Isolation frequency (%)
AI 1 BI 4.3 CI 9.5 DI 14.5 EIV 1.0 FI 25
AIV 18 BII 26 CII 2.0 DII 1.5 EII 4.0 FII 3
AV 7.5 BIII 2.2 CIV 5.0 DIII 3.0 EIII 5.0 FIII 29
AVI 8.5 BIV 17.4 CIII 74 DIV 52 EI 71 FIV 36
AVII 9.5 BV 2.2 CV 1.3 DV 0.7 EV 1.0 FV 2
AX 32 BVI 8.7 CVI 0.7 DVI 8.7 EVI 1.0 FVII 3
AXI 2 BVII 8.7 CVII 7.5 DVII 16 EVII 17 FVIII 2
AXII 14 BVIII 6.5 DVIII 0.7
AXIII 6 BIX 2.2 DIX 0.7
AXIV 1.5 BX 2.2 DX 1.5
BXI 2.2 DXI 0.7
BXII 8.7
BXIII 2.2
BIV 2.2
BXV 2.2
BXVI 2.2

Predominant strains are in bold and underlined.