Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Chem. 2017 Jul 18;63(11):1685–1694. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.259499

Table 1.

Comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequencing (16S), metagenomic shotgun sequencing (MSS), and bacterial group quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).

Time required for data production Potential PCR bias Microbial populations analyzed Method of quantification Functional analysis Computing requirements Data storage (per sample) Estimated cost (excluding labor)

16S Days to weeks Yes Bacteria only Relative abundance No Open-source software that can be run on desktop computers Megabytes $10-$50/sample (if batched with a large number of samples)
MSS Weeks to months No Bacteria, viruses, fungi Relative abundance Yes Bioinformatic analysis is CPU intensive (requiring computer clusters) Gigabytes $200-$800/sample (depending on depth of coverage desired)
qPCR Hours to days Yes Bacteria, viruses, fungi Gene copies No Spreadsheet program (e.g., Excel) that can be run on a desktop computer Bytes to kilobytes <$1/sample