Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 20;19:545. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4862-z

Table 4.

Predictive values of small ncRNA pair panels at the training and validation stages

Small ncRNA pair panels Sample size SEN SPE PPV NPV FPR FNR AUC
Panel 1: LAC+Benign vs. Control
 Training 85 vs. 29 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 1.000
 Validation 76 vs. 51 0.915 0.804 0.855 0.882 0.196 0.085 0.902
Panel 1: LAC vs. Control
 Training 50 vs. 29 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 1.000
 Validation 44 vs. 51 0.854 0.833 0.795 0.882 0.167 0.146 0.895
Panel 2: LAC vs. Benign
 Training 50 vs. 35 0.811 0.781 0.860 0.714 0.219 0.189 0.820
 Validation 44 vs. 32 0.704 0.727 0.864 0.500 0.273 0.296 0.742

AUC area under receiver operating characteristic curve, FNR false negative rate, FPR false positive rate, LAC lung adenocarcinoma, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value, SEN sensitivity, SPE specificity