Table 2.

ROIs, Data for Selection of ROIs, and Correlations Between the ROI Activation Levels in CI Users and Their Speech Test Scores.

Hypotheses	Stimuli, ROIs (channels)	Two-sample t tests CI versus NH	Group variances $\mathbf{R}({\underset{¯}{\sigma }}_{\mathbf{CI}}/{\underset{¯}{\sigma }}_{\mathbf{NH}})\ne 1$	Correlation with speech test scores	Bonferroni correction
Hypothesis 1	A(1 and 2)	t(19) = 2.68, p = .015	N/A	r = − .592, p = .020	p > .017
	A(7, 8, 11, and 12)	t(23) = 3,02, p = .006		r = −.650, p = .008*	p < .017
	A(26, 27,30)	t(26) = 3,18, p = .004		r = −.620, p = .014*	p < .017
Hypothesis 2	A(26, 27,32)	N/A	R = 2.751, p = .031	r = −.597, p = .019	p > .017
	V(13,18)		R = 4.490, p = .007	r = −.253, p = .404	p > .017
	V(27,32)		R = 6.062, p = .014	r = −.351, p = .200	p > .017
Hypothesis 3	V(12,14–16)	N/A	N/A	r = − .668, p = .009*	p < .025
	V(36, 37,41, 42)			r = −.449, p = .107	p > .025

Note. ROIs = regions of interest; CI = cochlear implant.