TABLE 3.
Weekly experiences of the weight-management program reported by SW and SC groups1
| VAS item, mm | SW | SC |
|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction | 72.8 (64.5, 81.0) | 54.2 (46.0, 62.3)** |
| Content | 69.8 (61.4, 78.1) | 50.1 (42.0, 58.3)** |
| Convenient | 71.5 (64.1, 78.9) | 62.7 (55.6, 69.9) |
| Easy to stick to | 64.5 (56.8, 72.2) | 45.5 (37.9, 53.1)** |
| Adhere to food choices | 59.5 (52.2, 66.8) | 44.5 (37.4, 51.6)** |
| In control | 69.0 (61.0, 77.1) | 54.3 (46.4, 62.2)* |
| Motivated | 76.2 (68.2, 84.2) | 60.1 (52.2, 68.0)** |
| Enjoyment | 71.9 (63.0, 80.9) | 53.0 (44.2, 61.8)** |
| Flexibility | 70.8 (63.5, 78.1) | 67.6 (60.4, 74.7) |
| Deprived | 30.8 (24.0, 37.6) | 30.4 (23.7, 37.1) |
| Abandon program | 39.0 (30.7, 47.3) | 43.8 (35.3, 52.3) |
1Values are means (95% CIs) based on SW n = 26; SC n = 27. Completers analysis shown. Results were the same for intention-to-treat analyses (with the use of last observation carried forward). *,**Different from SW, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. SC, standard care; SW, Slimming World; VAS, visual analogue scale.