Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 20.
Published in final edited form as: Eval Program Plann. 2003 Aug;26(3):339–352. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7189(03)00037-5

Table 1. Impact of RMC-ERI on long term outcomes and trajectories.

Variable Recovery management checkup (n = 224) (%) Control (n = 224) (%) Total (%) Odds ratio (95% CI) Statistic
Quarters of needing treatmenta
0–1 times 36 37 36 0.96 (0.65–1.41) X(2)2=6.6, p < 0:05
2–4 times 41 31 36 1.56 (1.06–2.30)
5–8 times 23 32 28 0.63 (0.41–0.96)
Final status at month 24b
Need for treatment readmission 43 56 50 0.58 (0.39–0.85) X(1)2=7.7, p < 0:01
24 Month pattern of needing treatmentc
Initial and sustained ‘No need’ 4 4 4 1.12 (0.45–2.80) Z = 2:4; p < 0:05
Need–‘No need’ 9 7 8 1.37 (0.68–2.74)
No need–Need–‘No need’ 33 26 29 1.35 (0.90–2.03)
Intermittent need ending in ‘No need’ 11 7 9 1.63 (0.85–3.15)
No need–‘Need’ 12 14 13 0.79 (0.45–1.37)
Intermittent need ending in ‘Need’ 25 33 29 0.68 (0.45–1.02)
Intitial and sustained ‘Need’ 6 8 7 0.71 (0.34–1.48)
a

Number of eight possible quarters in which people were eligible (currently living in the community and not already in treatment) and in need of treatment at 24 months based on self report (any past month abuse/dependence sysmptoms, use interfering with responsibilities, weekly use or past week use).

b

Percent who were eligible and in need based on the above criteria at the time of the 24 month interview.

c

Based on quarterly pattern of need and final status from above; Z based on Mann–Whitney U.