Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 20;6:63. doi: 10.1186/s40478-018-0564-7

Table 3.

Burden of DPR and aDMA by region in clinicopathologic subgroups

FCtx DF CA4 CA2/3 MCtx
poly-GA
FTLD 6.4 (3.8, 9.4) 310 (110, 470) 6 (4.1, 9.5) 5.6 (4.5, 8.3) 5.8 (3.7, 12)
FTLD-MND 7.5 (5.6, 15) 420 (320, 630) 9.5 (6.6, 13) 9.7 (4.7, 15) 14 (6.2, 17)
MND 7.4 (5.8, 13) 380 (280, 480) 10 (7.4, 14) 8.2 (3.0, 12) 9.3 (6.5, 13)
poly-GP
FTLD 9.7 (5.9,14) 120 (71, 262) 8 (6.7, 13) 19 (13, 33) 10 (6.7, 13)
FTLD-MND 13 (11, 18) 180 (98, 270) 13 (7.4, 18) 31 (19, 39) 10 (8.0, 14)
MND 10 (6.6, 16) 130 (86, 230) 13 (10, 17) 27 (16, 39) 11 (4.9, 18)
poly-GR
FTLD 3.0 (2.2, 4.2) 16 (9.5, 48) 3.0 (2.3, 5.6) 5.1 (3.3, 9.3) 2.6 (1.3, 5.5)
FTLD-MND 6.8 (3.7, 9.5)* 49 (26, 86)* 8.5 (6.8, 12)* 17 (11, 26)* 4.7 (3.1, 7.9)
MND 2.9(1.1, 3.4) 26 (18, 51) 7.5 (4.7, 8.8) 12 (3.7, 22) 2.6 (1.2, 4.9)
aDMA
FTLD 3.3 (2.8, 4.7) 83 (31, 100) 10 (6.8, 14) 16 (10, 37) 3.4 (2.1, 5.6)
FTLD-MND 5.5 (3.1, 8.2) 77 (21, 140) 17 (14, 22)* 25 (17, 36) 5.6 (4.6, 6.8)
MND 4.0 (2.1, 7.4) 53 (31, 81) 15 (12, 20) 15 (6, 29) 3.5(2.5, 5.6)

In frontal cortex, p < 0.001, FTLD vs. FTLD-MND, p = 0.005, FTLD-MND v.s MND. In DF, p = 0.02, FTLD vs. FTLD-MND. In CA4, p = 0.002, FTLD vs. FTLD-MND. In CA2/3, p = 0.003, FTLD vs. FTLD-MND. All variables analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA on Ranks and data are displayed as median (25th and 75th range)

*Statistically significant p-value (p < 0.05); all p-value for ANOVA on Ranks comparison of all three groups

FCtx frontal cortex, MCtx Motor cortex, DF dentate fascia, CA (cornu ammonis)