Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 22;7(7):55. doi: 10.1038/s41389-018-0066-2

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models for progression-free survival (N = 98)

Univariate Cox regression model Multivariate Cox regression model (ODS1 pos vs neg) Multivariate Cox regression model (ODS2 pos vs neg)
HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value
ODS1 Pos vs Neg 2.42 (1.44–4.06) 0.001 2.16 (1.28–3.64) 0.004
ODS2 Pos vs Neg 2.76 (1.59–4.80) <0.001 2.61 (1.49–4.58) 0.001
Gender Female vs Male 0.79 (0.51–1.24) 0.315
ECOG PS 1–2 vs 0 1.25 (0.82–1.89) 0.293
Side DX + TV vs SX 0.93 (0.61–1.41) 0.730
Targeted Agents in first-line therapy Yes vs No 0.86 (0.57–1.31) 0.498
Surgery for metastatic disease Yes vs No 0.63 (0.40–1.01) 0.054 0.58 (0.36–0.93) 0.024 0.56 (0.35–0.89) 0.015
Number of metastatic sites 2–3 vs 1 1.75 (1.14–2.68) 0.010 1.73 (1.11–2.70) 0.016 1.81 (1.16–2.82) 0.009

The multivariate Cox models were built with variables testing significant in univariate analysis