Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul;39(7):1215–1221. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5692

Table 4:

Statistical report comparing means of susceptibility values within injured and control groupsa

ROI Susceptibility Group Differences (Injured vs Control)
RTP vs 24-Hour Suscept
24 Hours
8 Days
6 Months
P D P D P D P ρ
White matter .032b 0.65b .001b 1.01b .463 0.25 .022b 0.55
Gray matter .980 −0.01 .255 −0.34 .382 −0.30 .146 −0.26
L ATR .017b 0.72b .069 0.55 .735 −0.11 .146 0.37
R cing (hipp) .072 0.53 .011b,c 0.79b .012b 0.91b .015b,c 0.58b
Forceps minor .017b 0.75b .008b,c 0.82b .738 0.11 .989 <0.01
L IFOF .127 0.46 .037b,c 0.63b .730 0.12 .015b,c 0.58b
R IFOF .073 0.55 .019b,c 0.72b .783 0.09 .480 0.18
L ILF .194 0.39 .027b,c 0.67b .650 0.15 .146 0.37
R ILF .187 0.40 .034b,c 0.64b .814 0.08 .003b,c 0.67b
L SLF .334 0.28 .014b,c 0.75b .550 0.21 .019b,c 0.56b
R SLF .021b 0.72b .002b,c 1.00b .819 0.08 .015b,c 0.58b
L SLF (temp) .847 0.06 .035b,c 0.64b .510 0.23 .034b,c 0.52b
R SLF (temp) .010b 0.82b .007b,c 0.83b .576 0.19 .412 0.21

Note:—ATR indicates anterior thalamic radiation; cing, cingulum; hipp, hippocampus; IFOF, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; ILF, inferior longitudinal fasciculus; SLF, superior longitudinal fasciculus; temp, temporal; RTP, return to play temporal duration; D, effect sizes; Suscept, susceptibility; L, left; R, right.

a

White matter regions showing significant trends and the global gray matter compartment are shown. At each visit, group differences are characterized with P values computed using 2-tailed independent samples t tests and effect sizes are computed using the Cohen D. The Pearson correlation of RTP temporal duration vs 24-hour susceptibility values for individual injured subjects is also presented. P values and effect sizes (ρ) are displayed. P values for the subregional analyses are reported without multiple-comparison corrections.

b

Effects that showed statistical significance (P < .05).

c

Statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons.