Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 11;7(7):giy084. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giy084

Table 2:

Performances of SL-quant with various parameters.

Dataset Method Run time Mapped SL-containing reads Trans-splice sites Site is “AG” consensus (%)
SRR1585277 SL-quant 4 minutes 02 seconds 65,126 6,301 6,149 (98)
  SL-quant -p 5 minutes 14 seconds 61,451 6,539 6,402 (98)
  SL-quant -s 2 minutes 45 seconds 120,542 8,770 8,254 (94)
  SL-quant -s -p 6 minutes 58 seconds 114,948 8,436 7,957 (94)
  Tourasse 4 minutes 45 seconds 120,710 8,932 8,260 (92)
modENCODE_4594 SL-quant 9 minutes 51 seconds 146,358 8,247 8,081 (98)
  SL-quant -s 3 minutes 10 seconds 258,706 10,735 9,948 (93)
  Tourasse 5 minutes 08 seconds 259,284 11,155 9,953 (89)
random SL-quant 3 minutes 20 seconds 53 52 34 (65)
  SL-quant -s 1m23s 5,757 5,692 5,612 (99 a)
  Tourasse 2m24s 8,890 8,777 5,612 (64)
a

The very high proportion of “AG” sites for the random dataset is an artifact caused by the fact that the reads were generated from randomly sampling the genome and that all the C. elegans SL sequences end by AG. -p: paired-end mode; -s: sensitive mode.