Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Retina. 2018 Sep;38(Suppl 1):S125–S133. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002036

Table 4.

Change in log MAR Visual Acuity from baseline: A comparison of outcomes for eyes undergoing Boston keratoprosthesis without pars plana vitrectomy to eyes with pars plana vitrectomy*

Keratoprosthesis without pars plana vitrectomy Keratoprosthesis with pars plana vitrectomy P value
Post-operative time (Months) Total number of eyes Number of Eyes Improved 1 or more logMAR % Eyes Improved 1 or more logMAR Total number of eyes Number of Eyes Improved 1 or more logMAR % Eyes Improved 1 or more logMAR
1 68 41 60% 54 34 63% 0.764
3 60 42 70% 47 31 66% 0.656
6 57 35 61% 47 27 57% 0.682
9 54 31 57% 37 23 62% 0.650
12 55 32 58% 36 21 58% 0.989
Last follow-up 62 27 44% 48 29 60% 0.079
Post-operative time (Months) Total number of eyes Number of Eyes Decreased 1 or more logMAR % Eyes Decreased 1 or more logMAR Total number of eyes Number of Eyes Decreased 1 or more logMAR % Eyes Decreased 1 or more logMAR
1 68 1 1% 54 2 4% 0.583
3 60 2 3% 47 0 0% 0.503
6 57 5 9% 47 3 6% 0.726
9 54 3 6% 37 2 5% 1.000
12 55 3 5% 36 3 8% 0.678
Last follow-up 62 14 23% 48 6 13% 0.217
*

NLP visual acuities excluded from logMAR calculations