Table 4.
Change in log MAR Visual Acuity from baseline: A comparison of outcomes for eyes undergoing Boston keratoprosthesis without pars plana vitrectomy to eyes with pars plana vitrectomy*
Keratoprosthesis without pars plana vitrectomy | Keratoprosthesis with pars plana vitrectomy | P value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Post-operative time (Months) | Total number of eyes | Number of Eyes Improved 1 or more logMAR | % Eyes Improved 1 or more logMAR | Total number of eyes | Number of Eyes Improved 1 or more logMAR | % Eyes Improved 1 or more logMAR | |
1 | 68 | 41 | 60% | 54 | 34 | 63% | 0.764 |
3 | 60 | 42 | 70% | 47 | 31 | 66% | 0.656 |
6 | 57 | 35 | 61% | 47 | 27 | 57% | 0.682 |
9 | 54 | 31 | 57% | 37 | 23 | 62% | 0.650 |
12 | 55 | 32 | 58% | 36 | 21 | 58% | 0.989 |
Last follow-up | 62 | 27 | 44% | 48 | 29 | 60% | 0.079 |
Post-operative time (Months) | Total number of eyes | Number of Eyes Decreased 1 or more logMAR | % Eyes Decreased 1 or more logMAR | Total number of eyes | Number of Eyes Decreased 1 or more logMAR | % Eyes Decreased 1 or more logMAR | |
1 | 68 | 1 | 1% | 54 | 2 | 4% | 0.583 |
3 | 60 | 2 | 3% | 47 | 0 | 0% | 0.503 |
6 | 57 | 5 | 9% | 47 | 3 | 6% | 0.726 |
9 | 54 | 3 | 6% | 37 | 2 | 5% | 1.000 |
12 | 55 | 3 | 5% | 36 | 3 | 8% | 0.678 |
Last follow-up | 62 | 14 | 23% | 48 | 6 | 13% | 0.217 |
NLP visual acuities excluded from logMAR calculations