Table 3.
Changes over timea in neonatal resuscitation indicators around “what went well” based on debriefing mobile App data collected during live births at 240 Phases 2–4 facilities in Bihar, India (N = 330)
| Non‐vigorous infant (n = 330) | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | Week 7 | Week 8 | p‐valuea |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identification of non‐vigorous infant | 24% (9) | 41% (16) | 49% (29) | 58% (24) | 73% (27) | 78% (28) | 74% (42) | 74% (17) | <.001 |
| Identification of asphyxia | 13% (5) | 33% (13) | 37% (22) | 59% (24) | 62% (23) | 83% (30) | 68% (39) | 61% (14) | <.001 |
| Identification of meconium | 32% (23) | 49% (19) | 39% (23) | 41% (17) | 57% (21) | 47% (17) | 56% (32) | 78% (18) | <.001 |
| Knowledge & skills of Bag and mask ventilation | 16% (6) | 18% (7) | 19% (11) | 22% (9) | 27% (10) | 44% (16) | 40% (23) | 48% (11) | <.001 |
| Suctioning knowledge & skills | 26% (10) | 31% (12) | 37% (22) | 54% (22) | 70% (26) | 75% (27) | 60% (34) | 70% (16) | <.001 |
a
Chi‐squared test of trend.