Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 16;5(3):341–350. doi: 10.1002/nop2.144

Table 2.

Nutritional assessments based on MNA‐SF (N = 677) in relation to planned and evaluated nursing interventions

Variables Total N = 677 In men N = 193 In women N = 484 p‐valuesa comparisons between men and women In persons with risk for malnutrition N = 395 In persons without risk for malnutrition N = 282 p‐valuesa comparisons between persons with and without risk In men with risk for malnutrition In women with risk for malnutrition p‐valuesa comparisons between persons with and without risk
N(%) N(%) N(%) N(%) N(%) N(%) N(%)
Planned .471 .001 .005
Yes 452 (66.8) 133 (68.9) 319 (65.9) 328 (83.0) 124 (44.0) 92 (92.0) 236 (80.0)
No 225 (33.2) 60 (31.1) 165 (34.1) 67 (17.0) 158 (56.0) 8 (8.0) 59 (20.0)
Evaluated interventions: .129 .001 .548
Yes 186 (27.5) 45 (23.3) 141 (29.1) 141 (35.7) 45 (16.0) 33 (33.0) 108 (36.6)
No 491 (72.5) 148 (76.7) 343 (70.9) 254 (64.3) 237 (84.0) 67 (67.0) 187 (63.4)

MNA‐SF, Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form.

a

Chi‐Square test.