Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 23;8:11100. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29486-4

Table 2.

Relationship between telomere length (TL) and epigenetic age (DNAmAge acceleration) measured in 2005 and parity over the subsequent four years (2005–2009). Models with and without adjustment for baseline gravidity in 2005.

Parity 2005–2009
Telomere Length DNAmAge
Unadjusted for Gravidity in 2005 Adjusted for Gravidity in 2005 Unadjusted for Gravidity in 2005 Adjusted fo rGravidity in 2005
Measurement time bt. 2005–2009 (Days) −0.003 −0.003 −0.002 −0.002
 p-values 0.005** 0.011* 0.058+ 0.068+
Parity in 2005 0.252 0.123
 p-values 0.000** 0.016*
Age Adjusted Telomere Length in 2005 0.041 0.155
 p-values 0.885 0.588
Age Adjusted DNAmAge in 2005 −0.011 −0.016
 p-values 0.484 0.325
Intercept 4.313 3.719 3.461 3.267
Observations 738 738 397 397
Log Likelihood −832.737 −814.371 −485.277 −482.434
Akaike Inf. Crit. 1,671.474 1,636.742 976.553 972.867

Note: +p < 0.1; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.