Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 22;53(Suppl Suppl 1):3148–3169. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12777

Table 1.

Characteristics of Weighting Structure between Study Participants, Postal Areas, Hospital Service Areas (HSAs), and Weighted Hospital Service Area Networks (Weighted‐HSANs)

Mean Interquartile Range Min–max
Postal areas (n = 593)
Number of study participants 451 82–561 1–4,166
Number of all‐cause hospitalizations 450 63–518 1–5,642
Number of public hospitals of admission 15 8–20 1–56
% all‐cause hospitalizations to the
Most common hospital 67 51–81 23–100
Second most common hospital 17 7–25 0–50
Third most common hospital 6 2–9 0–31
Hospital service areas (n = 72)
Study patient catchment size 3,705 1160–5798 12–12,801
Postal areas included 8 3–12 1–27
Market share index (%) 69 64 ‐ 87 0–97
Hospitals, from weighted‐HSANs (n = 79)
Weighted study patient catchment size 3,377 973–5720 277–13,227
Total postal areas serviced 111 50–136 17–377
Where hospital weight >5% 19 8–22 1–73
Where hospital weight >10% 14 6–17 0–57
Where hospital weight >20% 10 4–14 0–44
Where hospital weight >50% 6 1–10 0–26
Study participants (n = 266,762)
Number of hospitals in weighted‐HSAN 26 15–34 1–56
% weighting which is to the:
Most common hospital 70 54–85 23–100
Second most common hospital 14 4–22 0–50
Third most common hospital 5 2–6 0–31