Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 17;50(3):801–812. doi: 10.4143/crt.2017.210

Table 3.

Diagnostic performance of SLNB in all and subgroups of patients

Parameter Sensitivity (%) FNR (%) NPV (%) Accuracy (%)
Overall (n=20) 80.0 20.0 83.3 90.0
95% CI 55.2-100.0 0.0-44.8 62.2-100.0 76.9-100.0
No. of retrieved SLNs
 ≤ 2 (n=2) 0.0 100.0 50.0 50.0
 3 (n=11) 75.0 25.0 87.5 90.9
 ≥ 4 (n=7) 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
 p-value 0.089 0.089 0.576 0.305
Type of axillary surgery
 Axillary sampling (n=8) 66.7 33.4 83.3 87.5
 ALND (n=12) 85.7 14.3 83.3 91.7
 p-value > 0.999 > 0.999 > 0.999 > 0.999
Node response to NCT
 Response (n=11) 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
 Non-response (n=9) 71.4 28.6 50.0 77.8
 p-value > 0.999 > 0.999 0.091 0.190
Molecular phenotype
 Luminal (n=14) 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0
 Non-luminal (n=6) 33.3 66.7 60.0 66.7
 p-value 0.067 0.067 0.152 0.079

SLNB, sentinel lymph node biopsy; FNR, false-negative rate; NPV, negative predictive value; CI, confidence interval; SLNs, sentinel lymph nodes; ALND, axillary lymph node dissection; NCT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy.