Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 16;3(3):143–155. doi: 10.1002/lio2.149

Table 5.

Proportion of Respondents Utilizing Various Materials in ESBS Reconstruction.

Material Utilized Purely Intrasellar Transtuberculum/Transplanum Transcribriform Transclival
No CSF n = 54 +CSF Leak n = 54 Extradural n = 39 Intradural n = 40 Extradural n = 36 Intradural n = 39 Extradural n = 37 Intradural n = 37
No material/packing 33.3% 0% 10.3% 0% 13.9% 0% 56.8% 0%
Alloplastic dural substitute 18.5% 44.4% 35.9% 62.5% 33.3% 56.4% 32.4% 56.8%
Fascia lata 3.7% 5.6% 10.3% 20% 5.6% 23.1% 5.4% 13.5%
Fat 5.6% 48.1% 17.9% 37.5% 16.7% 35.6% 27% 51.4%
Bone 5.6% 18.5% 12.8% 17.9% 19.4% 20.5% 5.4% 10.8%
Cartilage 3.7% 13% 2.6% 10.3% 8.3% 10.3% 2.7% 5.4%
Medpor® button 7.4% 14.8% 2.6% 10.3% 2.8% 12.8% 0% 8.1%
Tissue glue 22.2% 53.7% 43.6% 59% 41.7% 56.4% 32.4% 56.8%
Absorbable packing 51.9% 59.3% 66.7% 74.3% 58.3% 71.8% 56.8% 70.3%
Merocel® pack with glove 3.7% 16.7% 15.4% 20% 13.9% 23.1% 8.1% 16.2%
Merocel® pack without glove 3.7% 7.4% 15.4% 17.5% 16.7% 23.1% 18.9% 18.9%
Balloon pack 0% 9.3% 12.8% 17.5% 2.8% 12.8% 5.4% 13.5%
Iodoform strip gauze 0% 1.9% 0% 7.5% 0% 5.1% 0% 2.7%

CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; ESBS = endoscopic skull base surgery.