Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 17;9:1209. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01209

Table 6.

Model comparison for strategy choice in Experiment 2.

BIC ΔBIC Log BF Model
M0 1453 0 1
M1 401 1052 16.20 pres.form + condition + grade + complexity
M2 385 1068 8.32 complexity + condition * grade + pres.form
M3 391 1061 11.55 pres.form + condition + grade * complexity
M4 400 1053 15.89 grade * pres.form + condition + complexity
M5 398 1055 14.59 pres.form + grade + complexity * condition
M6 406 1047 18.75 grade + condition * pres.form + complexity
M7 402 1051 16.66 condition + grade + pres.form * complexity
M8 397 1056 14.27 grade * pres.form + condition * complexity
M9 397 1056 14.09 condition * pres.form + complexity * grade
M10 386 1067 8.78 complexity * pres.form + grade * condition
M11 368 1084 condition * grade * complexity + pres.form
M12 396 1057 13.70 complexity + condition * pres.form * grade
M13 399 1054 15.29 condition + pres.form * grade * complexity
M14 409 1043 20.56 grade + condition * complexity * pres.form

BIC, Bayesian Information Criterion; ΔBIC, BIC difference with respect to the null model (M0); LogBF, approximated bayes factor respect to the best model (M11) calculated through the relative likelihood [i.e., (ΔBIC/2)]. The higher the ΔBIC the better the model. Strategy, type of strategy (i.e., counting, retrieval, decomposition, and written calculation); Grade, 3rd and 5th grade; Complexity: single or double-digit subtrahend; Condition (absence or presence of borrowing procedure); Pres.form, vertical and horizontal presentation format.