Table 2.
Bivariate relationship analysis between potential risk factors and BCTQ symptom and function scores at each measurement time.
Variables | BCTQ at 3months | BCTQ at 12 months | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Symptom scores | p | Function scores | p | Symptom scores | p | Function scores | p | |
Gender | ||||||||
Women (n = 96) | 1.8 ± 0.6 | 0.03 | 1.7 ± 0.6 | 0.04 | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 0.14 | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 0.10 |
Men (n = 24) | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.6 | 1.2 ± 0.5 | ||||
Hand dominance | ||||||||
Dominant (n = 74) | 1.7 ± 0.6 | 0.37 | 1.6 ± 0.6 | 0.40 | 1.6 ± 0.6 | 0.32 | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 0.34 |
Nondominant (n = 46) | 1.6 ± 0.6 | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | ||||
Bilaterality | ||||||||
Bilateral (n = 36) | 1.8 ± 0.6 | 0.13 | 1.7 ± 0.6 | 0.24 | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 0.11 | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 0.27 |
Unilateral (n = 84) | 1.6 ± 0.6 | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.6 | ||||
Electophysiologic gradea | ||||||||
Mild (n = 13) | 1.6 ± 0.6 | 0.11 | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 0.14 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 0.09 | 1.2 ± 0.5 | 0.03 |
Moderate (n = 64) | 1.6 ± 0.6 | 1.6 ± 0.6 | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 1.2 ± 0.6 | ||||
Severe (n = 43) | 1.8 ± 0.6 | 1.8 ± 0.6 | 1.6 ± 0.6 | 1.5 ± 0.6 | ||||
Correlation coefficient | p | Correlation coefficient | p | Correlation coefficient | p | Correlation coefficient | p | |
Age | 0.12 | 0.38 | 0.15 | 0.42 | 0.10 | 0.51 | 0.03 | 0.72 |
BMI | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.29 | 0.18 | 0.34 |
Education | 0.20 | 0.32 | 0.15 | 0.51 | 0.12 | 0.61 | 0.15 | 0.55 |
Symptom duration | 0.31 | 0.12 | 0.27 | 0.19 | 0.34 | 0.14 | 0.32 | 0.17 |
PPT | 0.45 | 0.02 | 0.40 | 0.03 | 0.35 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 0.13 |
CSI | 0.53 | 0.01 | 0.51 | 0.01 | 0.37 | 0.09 | 0.35 | 0.10 |
Baseline BCTQ symptom | 0.25 | 0.22 | 0.28 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.11 |
Baseline BCTQ function | 0.32 | 0.10 | 0.29 | 0.13 | 0.30 | 0.14 | 0.37 | 0.07 |
PPT = pain pressure thresholds; CSI = Central Sensitization Inventory; BMI = body mass index; BCTQ = Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire.
aBland staging was applied to grade the electrophysiologic severity; grades 0 and 1 were grouped as mild, grades 2 and 3 were grouped as moderate, and grades above 3 were grouped as severe.