Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 18;11:238. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00238

Figure 3.

Figure 3

CRY in the compound eyes enhances sensitivity to daylight. (A) Average locomotor activity profiles of WT flies (WTCantonS), cry01 mutants (cry01 (WTCantonS)), cry01 controls and cry01 mutants with CRY rescued in photoreceptor cells 1–6 (R1–6) under light-dark cycles with different daylight intensities. cry01 controls consist of ~half ninaE-gal4;cry01 flies and half UAS-cry;cry01 flies, respectively. We pooled the two controls, because they behaved similarly (p = 0.176). Flies were recorded under light-dark cycles with 12 h of light and 12 h of darkness (LD 12:12) with daylight intensities of 10, 100, 1000 and 10,000 lux, respectively. Light period (bar on top) and activity during the day are shown in light gray whereas the dark period (bar on top) and activity during the night are shown in black. Average activity profiles are normalized with maximal activity set to one. Faint gray lines above and below the average profiles represent standard errors of the mean (+SEM). Number of recorded animals are given in the right top corner of the upper diagram. (B) Mean percentage diurnal activity of total daily activity (± SEM) calculated for WT flies (WTCantonS), cry01 mutants (cry01 (WTCantonS) and cry01 controls) and cry01 mutants with CRY rescued in photoreceptor cells 1–6 (R1–6) under light-dark cycles with different daylight intensities. A two-way ANOVA showed that relative diurnal activity depended significantly on daylight intensity (F(3,504) = 172.017; p < 0.001) and on the strain (F(3,5204) = 53.108; p < 0.001) and that there was a significant interaction between the two (F(9,522) = 11.882; p < 0.001), indicating that diurnal activity decreased differently with increasing daylight intensity in the different strains. Post hoc analysis revealed significant differences between cry01 (WTCantonS) mutants and WTCantonS flies (p < 0.0001) as well as between cry01 controls (ninaE-gal4;cry01 and uas-cry;cry01 pooled) and cry01 mutants with CRY rescued in photoreceptor cells R1–6 (ninaE-gal4;uas-cry;cry01; p < 0.0001). Statistics: two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.