Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 25.
Published in final edited form as: Merrill Palmer Q (Wayne State Univ Press). 2016 Oct;62(4):415–439.

Table 2.

Unstandardized Estimates and 95% Bias-Corrected Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects

Unstandardized Estimates Lower C.I. Upper C.I.
Indirect Effects to Peer Rejection
 Emotion regulation → Direct aggression → Peer rejection −.05 −.15 −.01
 Emotion regulation → Indirect aggression → Peer rejection −.05 −.14 −.01
 Emotion regulation → Cooperation → Peer rejection −.10 −.24 −.01
 Emotion regulation → Leadership → Peer rejection −.04 −.12 .01
Indirect Effects to Peer Acceptance
 Emotion regulation → Direct aggression → Peer acceptance .01 −.02 .08
 Emotion regulation → Indirect aggression → Peer acceptance −.06 −.13 −.02
 Emotion regulation → Cooperation → Peer acceptance .19 .09 .41
 Emotion regulation → Leadership → Peer acceptance .12 .05 .25