Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 27;25(1):690–702. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2018.1444684

Table 3.

Observed responses for the Box–Behnken design..

Std/Run Independent variables
Dependent variables
Mode X1 X2 X3 Y1 Y2 Y3
9/7 0/−1/−1 4 1.8 6 38.26 97.06 0.0564
10/5 0/+1/−1 4 2.2 6 24.31 82.65 0.0458
11/3 0/−1/+1 4 1.8 14 33.45 94.78 0.0711
12/15 0/+1/+1 4 2.2 14 17.89 68.54 0.0688
5/4 −1/0/−1 2 2.0 6 37.12 98.04 0.0419
6/12 +1/0/−1 6 2.0 6 42.90 98.58 0.0520
7/16 −1/0/+1 2 2.0 14 29.78 89.04 0.0393
8/9 +1/0/+1 6 2.0 14 34.67 92.35 0.0816
1/17 −1/−1/0 2 1.8 10 35.24 96.87 0.0459
2/2 +1/−1/0 6 1.8 10 40.03 98.96 0.0774
3/1 −1/+1/0 2 2.2 10 15.04 62.18 0.0297
4/10 +1/+1/0 6 2.2 10 20.56 70.63 0.0806
14/6 0/0/0 4 2.0 10 19.48 85.74 0.0823
17/8 0/0/0 4 2.0 10 18.33 83.66 0.0659
16/11 0/0/0 4 2.0 10 19.09 84.79 0.0741
15/13 0/0/0 4 2.0 10 18.97 85.27 0.0692
13/14 0/0/0 4 2.0 10 19.20 82.23 0.0781

X1 is the factor of strength of the preparation, X2 is the factor of CS amount, X3 is the factor of GP content, Y1 is the response of cumulative release percentage of PYM in 1 day, Y2 is the response of cumulative release percentage PYM in 9 days, Y3 is the response of rate constant k.