Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 25.
Published in final edited form as: Stroke. 2016 Apr 12;47(5):1389–1398. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012364

Table 6.

Research priorities

Patient selection research priorities
Standardization of core, mismatch and collaterals definitions
  • Standardizing acceptable methods and imaging parameters within and across modalities

  • Comparability of NCCT ASPECTS, DWI, PCT volume estimates and thresholds, collateral scores on multi-phase or single-phase CTA

  • Equivalent definitions and thresholds of mismatch across modalities including coregistration methods between core and perfusion imaging in order to precisely measure the mismatch volume

  • Acceptable variability, i.e. inter-rater reliability, centralized review versus individual site review

  • Defining futility thresholds

  • Validation of semi-automated methods or fully automated methods of image quantification across vendor platforms, devices and modalities

Final infarct volume research priorities
  • Recommended as outcome measure at Phase II to assess biological effect of therapy

  • Comparison to baseline core volume preferred (volume of change or statistical adjustment)

  • Acceptable variability, i.e. inter-rater reliability, centralized review versus individual site review

  • Optimal timing and modality/sequence

  • Correction for edema, shift due to mass effect, hemorrhagic transformation, atrophy and pre-existing chronic lesions