Table 3.
Design Considerations in Prospective Molecular Epidemiology Studies of HF
Study Design Feature | HF Implications | Cohort Examples |
---|---|---|
Sample size | Very large cohorts or combined cohorts needed due to disease heterogeneity | PMI (n = 1 million), UK Biobank (n = 500,000), consortia for genomics (CHARGE-HF, GENIUS-CHD, HERMES, MGC, TOPMed) and plasma profiles (HOMAGE, inHForm) |
Phenotypic characterization | Heterogeneous phenotype: need for standardized definitions and cardiac imaging | ESC diagnostic algorithm in several cohorts, Framingham criteria |
Tissue sampling | Multiple tissues involved, heart most important but difficult to obtain | Multi-tissue: GTEx, heart tissue: MAGNet |
Follow-up | Repeat sampling warranted | Biannual examinations in Framingham Heart Study, annual sampling in inHForm project |
CHARGE-HF = Heart Failure working group of the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research consortium; GENIUS-CHD = GENetIcs of sUbSequent Coronary Heart Disease; GTEx = Genotype-Tissue Expression project; HERMES = Heart Failure Molecular Epidemiology for Therapeutic Targets; HOMAGE = Heart Omics in AGEing consortium; inHForm = INtegrative omics of Heart Failure to infORM discovery of novel drug targets and clinical biomarkers; MAGNet = Myocardial Applied Genomics Network; MGC = Myocardial Genetics Consortium; PMI = Precision Medicine Initiative; TOPMed = National Heart Lung Blood Institute Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine Program; other abbreviations as in Table 2.