Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 25;2(6):631–642. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.07.015

Table 2.

Intra-Device Repeatability of BP Measurement by CLB and CB

ICC (95% CI) Mean Difference ± 2 SDs
Total (N = 932)
 SBP 0.918 (0.907–0.927) −0.41 ± 16.1
 DBP 0.842 (0.812–0.866) −1.53 ± 12.8
Static (n = 386)
 SBP 0.950 (0.940–0.959) 0.26 ± 13.1
 DBP 0.903 (0.880–0.921) −1.01 ± 10.8
BP rise (n = 182)
 SBP 0.920 (0.889–0.942) −2.07 ± 14.9
 DBP 0.805 (0.514–0.902) −4.04 ± 11.2
BP lowering (n = 102)
 SBP 0.856 (0.794–0.900) 1.00 ± 20.3
 DBP 0.784 (0.697–0.875) −0.60 ± 15.3
Reproducibility (n = 262)
 SBP 0.844 (0.805–0.849) −0.77 ± 18.3
 DBP 0.752 (0.694–0.800) −0.90 ± 14.5

The reproducibility of the measurements, the ICC and its 95% confidence interval (CI) value between the BP value of test device (CLB) and the reference device (CB; cuff-wearing sphygmomanometer), were calculated. In general, an ICC >0.8 represents good repeatability, and an ICC >0.9 represents excellent repeatability of measurements.

ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient; other abbreviations as in Table 1.