Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 19;8(7):e021152. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021152

Table 2.

The temporal change in the proportion of hospitalised elderly patients taking any PIMs from admission to discharge according to their primary diagnosis for admission. Values are given as numbers (percentages) unless stated otherwise

Primary diagnosis for admission Proportion of patients taking any PIMs*
At admission At discharge Reduction rate (95% CI) P values†
Total, n=689 330 (47.9) 173 (25.1) 0.48 (0.41 to 0.53) <0.001
Heart failure, n=153 75 (49.0) 50 (32.7) 0.33 (0.16 to 0.47) <0.001
Pneumonia, n=141 75 (53.2) 33 (23.4) 0.56 (0.43 to 0.66) <0.001
Ischaemic stroke, n=108 43 (40.0) 27 (25.0) 0.37 (0.12 to 0.55) 0.001
GI bleeding, n=71 34 (47.9) 11 (15.5) 0.68 (0.47 to 0.80) <0.001
UTI, n=58 28 (48.3) 13 (22.4) 0.54 (0.29 to 0.70) <0.001
COPD or asthma, n=57 31 (54.4) 20 (35.1) 0.35 (0.14 to 0.51) <0.001
ACS, n=56 23 (41.1) 10 (17.9) 0.57 (0.28 to 0.74) <0.001
Epilepsy, n=45 21 (46.7) 9 (20.0) 0.57 (0.30 to 0.74) <0.001

*PIMs were defined based on the 2015 American Geriatric Society Beers Criteria.

†Comparison of the numbers at admission and at discharge using Fisher’s exact test.

ACS, acute coronary syndrome; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; GI, gastrointestinal; PIM, potentially inappropriate medication; UTI, urinary tract infection.