Table 1.
Study No. | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | |
N | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Mean (±SD) VTG in control females | 27.6 ± 21.5 | 43.0 ± 16.1 | 107 ± 38.0 | 154 ± 36.2 | 66.7 ± 19.0 | 67.2 ± 47.3 | 33.5 ± 8.48 | 66.3 ± 22.9 | 70.5 ± 77.7 | 12.2 ± 4.17 | 22.9 ± 9.49 |
Power to detect a 20% decrease | 5.9 | 9.0 | 9.4 | 16.1 | 12.2 | 6.1 | 14.4 | 9.8 | 5.4 | 9.9 | 8.2 |
Power to detect a 40% decrease | 8.7 | 23.3 | 25.5 | 54.2 | 38.5 | 9.6 | 47.6 | 27.1 | 6.8 | 27.4 | 19.6 |
Power to detect a 60% decrease | 13.9 | 48.7 | 53.1 | 89.6 | 74.3 | 16.1 | 84.4 | 56.1 | 9.2 | 56.6 | 40.6 |
Power to detect a 80% decrease | 21.9 | 75.4 | 79.8 | 99.2 | 94.7 | 26.0 | 98.2 | 82.6 | 12.8 | 83.2 | 65.8 |
Power analyses were conducted in SAS 9.2 PROC GLMPOWER (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA).
VTG = vitellogenin.