Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;132(2):365–370. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002699

Table 1.

Characteristics of women who attempted an external cephalic version procedure compared to those who did not (expectant management)

Characteristic ECV attempted (n=1263) ECV not attempted ‘Expectant management’ (n=2854) p-value
Age (y) 32.7±4.8 32.4±4.8 0.13
Nulliparous 713 (56.4) 2185 (76.6) <0.001
Race and ethnicity 0.02
 Non-Hispanic White 756 (59.9) 1684 (59.0)
 Non-Hispanic Black 62 (4.9) 211 (7.4)
 Hispanic 179 (14.2) 354 (12.4)
 Asian 55 (4.3) 148 (5.2)
 Other or unknown 211 (16.7) 457 (16.0)
BMI at delivery (kg/m2) (n=3653) 29.3±5.1 30.1±5.4 <0.001
Chronic hypertension 18 (1.4) 41 (1.4) 0.98
Pre-gestational diabetes 7 (0.5) 12 (0.4) 0.56
Gestational diabetes 64 (5.1) 130 (4.6) 0.47

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or n (%)

ECV, external cephalic version; BMI, body mass index