Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Dec 7;5(5):978–994. doi: 10.1007/s40615-017-0445-y

Table 4.

Mean differences in scores (standard errors) for the association of demographic, psychosocial and neighborhood factors with disengagement coping subscales, Jackson Heart Study (Exam 1, 2000–2004) a

Problem focused
disengagement
Emotion focused
disengagement

Model 1 b Model 2 Model 1 b Model 2
Age −0.01 (0.00) −0.01 (0.01) −0.01 (0.00) −0.00 (0.00)
Male −0.64 (0.10) −0.59 (0.13) −0.36 (0.08) −0.25 (0.09)
Married 0.16 (0.11) 0.16 (0.14) −0.19 (0.08) −0.20 (0.10)

Socioeconomic factors

Income (per $10,000) −0.15 (0.02) −0.07 (0.03) −0.01 (0.02) 0.06 (0.02)
Education level c
  HS degree −0.72 (0.15) −0.68 (0.21) 0.47 (0.09) 0.34 (0.15)
  College and higher −1.06 (0.17) −0.75 (0.22) 0.94 (0.13) 0.91 (0.16)
Wealth 0.02 (0.04) 0.02 (0.25) −0.04 (0.03) 0.01 (0.04)

Psychosocial factors

Depressive symptoms (per 10 unit change) 0.55 (0.08) 0.44 (0.06)
Global stress 0.10 (0.13) 0.45 (0.09)
Everyday discrimination −0.04 (0.07) 0.06 (0.05)
Lifetime discrimination −0.05 (0.03) 0.00 (0.02)
Optimism −0.22 (0.13) 0.04 (0.09)
Spirituality 0.04 (0.01) −0.02 (0.01)
Interpersonal support −0.72 (0.16) −1.09 (0.11)

Neighborhood factors d

Economic disadvantage 0.04 (0.12) 0.04 (0.08)
Social cohesion 0.91 (1. 01) 0.19 (0.71)
Violence 1.36 (1.21) −0.11 (0.86)
a

Neighborhood factors were assessed between Exams 1 and 2 (2004–2008)

b

Model 1 adjusts for age, gender and marital status; Model 2 is also adjusted for psychosocial and neighborhood factors

c

Reference group is less than high school education

d

Between-neighborhood variance was equal to zero in mixed models so results from the individual-level model are presented; models include unconditional Empirical Bayes’ estimate for neighborhood social cohesion and neighborhood violence

Bolded coefficients are significant at p<0.05