Table 6.
Associations (Odds ratio, 95% Confidence Interval) between demographic, psychosocial and neighborhood factors with religious coping and John Henryism, and mean differences (standard errors) in scores for associations with coping with discrimination subscales, Jackson Heart Study (Exam 1, 2000–2004) a
| Religious Coping | John Henryism | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Model 1 b | Model 2 | Model 1 b | Model 2 | |
| Age (per 10 years) | 1.15 [1.08,1.23] | 1.06 [0.96,1.17] | 1.14 [1.08,1.20] | 1.31 [1.20,1.42] |
| Male | 0.60 [0.52,0.69] | 0.70 [0.57,0.87] | 0.80 [0.71,0.90] | 0.90 [0.76,1.08] |
| Married | 1.09 [0.93,1.27] | 1.14 [0.91,1.43] | 1.09 [0.96,1.24] | 1.20 [0.99,1.45] |
|
| ||||
| Socioeconomic factors | ||||
|
| ||||
| Income (per $10,000) | 1.01 [0.98,1.04] | 0.98 [0.94,1.02] | 0.98 [0.96,1.01] | 0.99 [0.95,1.02] |
| Education level c | ||||
| HS degree | 1.06 [0.85,1.32] | 0.88 [0.63,1.24] | 1.01 [0.85,1.20] | 0.96 [0.72,1.27] |
| College and higher | 1.39 [1.09,1.77] | 1.05 [0.73,1.53] | 1.06 [0.87,1.28] | 1.02 [0.75,1.38] |
| Wealth | 1.04 [0.98,1.10] | 0.99 [0.91,1.07] | 1.07 [1.03,1.12] | 1.02 [0.95,1.10] |
|
| ||||
| Psychosocial factors | ||||
|
| ||||
| Depressive symptoms (per 10 unit change) | 0.94 [0.83,1.07] | 1.02 [0.90,1.14] | ||
| Global stress | 1.06 [0.85,1.31] | 1.02 [0.85,1.22] | ||
| Everyday discrimination | 0.95 [0.85,1.07] | 1.14 [1.04,1.25] | ||
| Lifetime discrimination | 1.07 [1.03,1.11] | 1.01 [0.98,1.04] | ||
| Optimism | 1.08 [0.88,1.31] | 0.87 [0.73,1.04] | ||
| Spirituality | 1.23 [1.20,1.26] | 1.02 [1.00,1.04] | ||
| Interpersonal support | 1.74 [1.35,2.23] | 1.09 [0.89,1.34] | ||
|
| ||||
| Neighborhood factors d | ||||
|
| ||||
| Economic disadvantage | 0.98 [0.82,1.17] | 1.10 [0.94,1.28] | ||
| Social cohesion | 2.22 [0.42,1.78] | 0.46 [0.13,1.71] | ||
| Violence | 1.62 [0.23,11.28] | 0.64 [0.13,3.06] | ||
Neighborhood factors were assessed between Exams 1 and 2 (2004–2008)
Model 1 adjusts for age, gender and marital status; Model 2 is also adjusted for psychosocial and neighborhood factors
Reference group is less than high school education
Between-neighborhood variance was equal to zero in mixed models so results from the individual-level model are presented; models include unconditional Empirical Bayes’ estimate for neighborhood social cohesion and neighborhood violence
Bolded coefficients are significant at p<0.05;
p=0.05