Table 5.
Two group comparisons of paths for men and women users.
| χ2 | Df | Δχ2 from base model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unconstrained base model a | 256.158 | 127 | ||
| Constrained paths b | HTSE → PU | 264.212 | 7.626* | |
| HTSE → PEOU | 264.048 | 7.502** | ||
| HTSE → ATT | 268.181 | 10.232** | ||
| PU → ATT | 268.166 | 0.121ns | ||
| PU → INT | 256.321 | 0.164ns | ||
| PEOU → ATT | 259.264 | 0.051ns | ||
| PEOU → INT | 256.219 | 0.072ns | ||
| ATT → INT | 256.297 | 0.172ns | ||
Note. PU = perceived usefulness; PEOU = perceived ease of use; ATT = attitude toward using PHR; INT = intention to use PHR; HTSE = health-care technology self-efficacy.
aPaths for the two groups were allowed to be freely estimated.
bThe path specified was constrained to be equal across the two groups.
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ns = not significant.