Table 6.
Hypothesis results.
| Path | Hypothesis | Results | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relationship | |||
| H1a | PU → ATT | Positive | Supported |
| H1b | PU → INT | Positive | Supported |
| H2a | PEOU → PU | Positive | Supported |
| H2b | PEOU → ATT | Positive | Not supported |
| H2c | PEOU → INT | Positive | Supported |
| H3 | ATT → INT | Positive | Supported |
| H4a | HTSE → PU | Positive | Supported |
| H4b | HTSE → PEOU | Positive | Supported |
| H4c | HTSE → ATT | Positive | Supported |
| Gender difference | |||
| H5a | HTSE → PU | Men > Women | Not supported (women > men) |
| H5b | HTSE → PEOU | Men > Women | Not supported (women > men) |
| H5c | HTSE → ATT | Men > Women | Not supported (women > men) |
| H6a | PU → ATT | Men > Women | Not supported (no difference) |
| H6b | PU → INT | Men > Women | Not supported (no difference) |
| H7a | PEOU → ATT | Women > Men | Not supported (no difference) |
| H7b | PEOU → INT | Women > Men | Not supported (no difference) |
| H8 | ATT → INT | Men > Women | Not supported (no difference) |
Note. PU = perceived usefulness; PEOU = perceived ease of use; ATT = attitude toward using PHR; INT = intention to use PHR; HTSE = health-care technology self-efficacy.