Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2018 Mar;78(1):4.36.1–4.36.19. doi: 10.1002/cpcb.38

Table 1.

Criteria for choosing FPs and reporters.

Property Design preference Complications
Spectra Narrow, and distinct, for separability by filters (see Figure 2) Spectra (excitation or emission) that are particularly broad, have multiple distant peaks, or overlap greatly (for two FPs) can lead to bleed-through noise
Quantum yield (QY) High, for brightness When low, FP is inefficient and dim, requiring more intense excitation
Extinction coefficient High, for brightness When low, FP absorbs light poorly, requiring more intense excitation
Maturation time Low, for expression sensors When high, protein is slow to develop its chromophore, and not suitable for reporting expression levels dynamically
Aggregation Low, for image quality When high, imagery is corrupted by puncta and activity may be altered by dimer/multimer formation
Photobleaching time Long (slow bleaching), for dynamics When short (rapid bleaching), dynamic measurements may be corrupted
pKa Low, for selectivity When near physiological pH (6–7.4), fluorescence can be sensitive to pH changes, esp. in lysosomes