Skip to main content
. 2018 May 21;6(5):1276–1286. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.676

Table 3.

Foaming capacity (FC, %) and foam stability (FS, min) of skipjack tuna roe concentrates with pH‐shift

Sample BDC SDC EW
Control
FC (%) 104.9 ± 3.2bB 104.8 ± 1.4bB 126.6 ± 13.1bA
15min 93.4 ± 4.9
30min 88.5 ± 5.8
60min 84.9 ± 6.8
pH 2
FC (%) 109.8 ± 3.9bB 106.0 ± 1.6bB 136.5 ± 5.0bA
60min 72.9 ± 4.1
pH 4
FC (%) 104.0 ± 0.0bB 104.0 ± 0.0bB 131.0 ± 6.35bA
60min 76.4 ± 9.7
pH 6
FC (%) 106.0 ± 3.2bB 106.5 ± 3.0bB 131.6 ± 16.9bA
60min 91.4 ± 5.3
pH 7
FC (%) 106.2 ± 2.7bA 105.7 ± 2.2bB 125.1 ± 17.0bA
60min 91.7 ± 4.5
pH 8
FC (%) 106.9 ± 2.1bB 105.2 ± 1.5bB 129.4 ± 17.0bA
60min 94.1 ± 8.9
pH 10
FC (%) 107.6 ± 4.0bB 105.7 ± 2.1bB 133.4 ± 18.9bA
60min 91.2 ± 4.1
pH 12
FC (%) 118.2 ± 9.5aB 119.0 ± 3.8aB 172.3 ± 28.1aA
15min 74.2 ± 18.1 71.5 ± 12.6 80.8 ± 2.3
30min 59.7 ± 14.4 64.6 ± 7.4 76.8 ± 2.4
60min 45.6 ± 12.1 47.9 ± 6.7 71.9 ± 3.2

Values represent the mean ± SD of n = 3. Means with different small letters within the same column and capital letters within same row are significantly different at < .05 by Duncan's multiple range test.

BDC, boil‐dried concentrate; SDC, steam‐dried concentrate; EW, egg white.