. 2018 May 4;27(8):2411–2421. doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1099-z

Table 3.

Correlations among the SCS subscales and the other questionnaires

	SCS
	Self-kindness	Self-judgment	Common humanity	Isolation	Mindfulness	Over-identification
STAIC Anxiety	−.38_a**	.61_b**	−.19_a*	.58_b**	−.25_a*	.58_b**
CDI Depression	−.53_a**	.58_a**	−.32_a**	53_b**	−.38_a**	.49_a**
UCL-A
Active tackling	.50_a**	−.25_b*	.37_a**	−.25_a*	.48_a**	−.25_b*
Palliative reacting	.07_a	.18_a*	.13_a	−.02_a	.22_a*	.06_a
Avoidance	−.07_a	.19_a*	.00_a	.22_b*	−.09_a	.09_a
Social support seeking	.42_a**	−.25_b*	.22_a*	−.28_a*	.30_a*	−.08_b
Passive reacting	−.47_a**	.56_a**	−.33_a**	.53_b**	−.36_a**	.56_b**
Expression of emotion	−.29_a*	.25_a*	−.23_a*	.17_a	−.21_a*	.26_a*
Reassuring thoughts	.41_a**	−.11_b	.47_a**	−.09_b	.35_a**	−.19_a*

N = 130. SCS Self-Compassion Scale, STAIC State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children, CDI Children’s Depression Inventory, UCL-A Utrecht Coping List for Adolescents. Correlations not sharing similar subscripts signify that the strength of the associations with symptom and coping measures was significantly different for self-kindness vs. self-judgment, common humanity vs. isolation, and mindfulness vs. over-identification. *p < .05, **p < .001