Table 2.
Type | Context | Euphorbiaceae | Fabaceae | Lamiaceae | Moraceae | Myrtaceae | Phyllanthaceae | Proteaceae | Simaroubaceae | Ulmaceae | Number of Identifiable Fragments | Indeterminable | Total number of analysed fragments | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mallotus sp. | Bauhinia sp. | Erythrophleum sp. | Vachellia sp. | Vitex sp. | Lamiaceae sp. | Ficus sp. type A | Ficus sp. type B | Ficus indeterminate | Corymbia sp. | Eucalyptus sp. type A | Eucaltptus sp. type B | Eucalyptus sp. indeterminate | Melaleuca sp. | Myrtaceae sp | Flueggea sp. | Grevillea/Hakea sp. | Brucea sp. | Celtis sp. | |||||
Absolute fragment counts | |||||||||||||||||||||||
C | F1-C | 45 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 26 | 6 | 13 | 8 | 0 | 163 | 20 | 1 | 5 | 18 | 0 | 34 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 373 | 145 | 518 |
C | F2-C | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 23 | 9 | 23 | 6 | 2 | 163 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 1 | 27 | 0 | 5 | 23 | 328 | 83 | 411 |
A | F3-A | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 44 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 101 | 98 | 199 |
B | F4-B | 3 | 7 | 21 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 138 | 13 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 260 | 179 | 439 |
B | F5-B | 1 | 6 | 26 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 156 | 55 | 18 | 11 | 25 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 317 | 162 | 479 |
B | F7-B | 0 | 6 | 22 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 163 | 34 | 19 | 20 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 309 | 170 | 479 |
A | F8-A | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 17 | 23 |
A | F9-A | 0 | 2 | 92 | 28 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 158 | 73 | 231 |
A | F10-A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
A | F11-A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 15 |
A | F12-A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 11 |
A | F13-A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
Proportion of total number of analysed fragments | |||||||||||||||||||||||
C | F1-C | 8.7 | 0.0 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 31.5 | 3.9 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 6.6 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 72.0 | 28.0 | 100 |
C | F2-C | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 5.6 | 2.2 | 5.6 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 39.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 5.4 | 0.2 | 6.6 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 5.6 | 79.8 | 20.2 | 100 |
A | F3-A | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 22.1 | 7.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 8.5 | 0.0 | 50.8 | 49.2 | 100 |
B | F4-B | 0.7 | 1.6 | 4.8 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 31.4 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 59.2 | 40.8 | 100 |
B | F5-B | 0.2 | 1.3 | 5.4 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 32.6 | 11.5 | 3.8 | 2.3 | 5.2 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 66.2 | 33.8 | 100 |
B | F7-B | 0.0 | 1.3 | 4.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 34.0 | 7.1 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 1.0 | 64.5 | 35.5 | 100 |
A | F8-A | 0.0 | 0.0 | 13.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 26.1 | 73.9 | 100 |
A | F9-A | 0.0 | 0.9 | 39.8 | 12.1 | 1.3 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.2 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 68.4 | 31.6 | 100 |
A | F10-A | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 100 |
A | F11-A | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 20.0 | 80.0 | 100 |
A | F12-A | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 27.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 36.4 | 63.6 | 100 |
A | F13-A | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 15.4 | 84.6 | 100 |
Results for F1-C and F2-C (SU1 and SU2) are reproduced from Whitau et al. (2016a)