Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 22;32(7):485–491. doi: 10.1007/s12149-018-1272-x

Table 2.

Quantitative values for various brain regions in the nine subjects

CBF (mL/100 mL/min) CMRO2 (mL/100 mL/min)
vMPFC 50.4 ± 5.9a,c,d,e,l 3.6 ± 0.5a,d,e,g,k,l
aMPFCa 35.8 ± 7.5d,e,g,k 2.6 ± 0.5d,e,g,k
PCCb 47.8 ± 7.6c,e,f,h,k 3.7 ± 0.8e,f,h
L.LatP c 40.2 ± 6.6 d,f,I,j 3.3 ± 0.5 d,f,l
R.LatPd 33.8 ± 6.1e,j,k 2.7 ± 0.5e,k,l
L.Sup.Fe 23.5 ± 3.5f,k 1.6 ± 0.3f,i,k
R.Sup.Ff 29.3 ± 5.5k 2.2 ± 0.4i,j
L.ITg 39.1 ± 7.9h 3.0 ± 0.5j
R.ITh 37.6 ± 6.7i 2.9 ± 0.5i,l
L.PHCi 36.3 ± 2.8j,l 2.4 ± 0.4j,l
R.PHCj 38.8 ± 4.3 2.4 ± 0.4
Cerebk 52.2 ± 9.6l 3.6 ± 0.7l
Retro-spleniall 29.7 ± 7.0 2.0 ± 0.5

a anterior, v ventral, L left, R right, MPFC medial prefrontal cortex, Sup.F superior frontal cortex, IT inferior temporal cortex, PHC parahippocampal gyrus, PCC posterior cingulate cortex, LatP lateral parietal cortex, Cereb cerebellar tonsils

a–lThere is a significant difference between the two regions (p < 0.05 with Bonferroni correction)