Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 14;26(7):2183–2195. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4730-4

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

General information Study design Surgery
References Year of publication Design N (patients) Gender (M:F) Mean age (SD/range) Mean follow-up (months; SD/range) Stabilization technique Surgery type Additional procedures performed Questionnaires used
Baray et al. [3] 2014 Retrospective 21 21:9 30.6 (± 12.4) 18 (± 8) Hemi-Castaing procedure TD NR Tegner; AOFAS; Karlsson
Bell et al. [5] 2006 NR 22 NR 20.7 (18–23) 26.3 (24.6–27.9) Bröstrom Arep NR SANE; FAOS, AOFAS
Caprio et al. [8] 2006 NR 11 8:3 NR 14.1 (NR) Reconstruction with allogeneic semitendinosis graft AR NR AOFAS; SF-12
Cho et al. [9] 2012 Prospective Modified Bröstrom Arep
20 12:8 33.9 (21–42) 28.4 (24–33) Transosseous suture 10 Karlsson
20 11:9 30.7 (15–44) 29.2 (24–34) Suture anchor 9 Karlsson
de Vries et al. [11] 2008 Prospective 39 19:20 43.2 (± 11.1) 9 (NR) Capsular shrinkage CS 39 Karlsson; SF-36
Ellis et al. [15] 2011 Retrospective 11 4:7 48.9 (± 11.4) 42 (± 12.4) Anatomic lateral ligament reconstruction with tendon allograft (n.s.) AR NR FAOS; SF-36; Karlsson
Hu et al. [20] 2013 Prospective Modified Bröstrom Arep
40 32:8 34.8 (20–50) 34.2 (24–72) Bone tunnel 21 AOFAS; Karlsson
41 33:8 33.3 (19–52) 32.8 (24–64) Suture anchor 26 AOFAS; Karlsson
Hua et al. [21] 2012 NR 35 * 29.2 (18–52) 37.9 (24–54) Reconstruction with semitendinosis allograft AR NR AOFAS; Karlsson
Hyer et al. [22] 2004 Retrospective 4 3:1 29 (20–32) 6 (NR) Capsular shrinkage CS NR Modified AOFAS
Ibrahim et al. [23] 2007 NR 14 21:2 25 (18–29) NR Reconstruction with gracilis tendon AR NR AOFAS; VAS; Karlsson; OMAS
Kim et al. [24] 2015 Prospective 29 24:5 Med 24 (19–46) 21 (23–51) Reconstruction with peroneus tendon TD 26 Karlsson
Krips et al. [26] 2002 Retrospective 54 32:22 25 (± 4.2) 19.9 (± 3.6) Karlsson technique Arep NR Karlsson
45 30:15 24 (± 4.2) 21.8 (± 4.6) Evans tenodesis TD NR Karlsson
Mabit et al. [30] 2010 Retrospective 310 164:146 28 (± 10) 156 (60–360) Duquennoy; augmented repair; (hemi-) Castaing CS NR Karlsson; Tegner
Maffulli et al. [32] 2013 Retrospective 38 NR 25.3 (18–41) 104.4 (± 32.5) Bröstrom Arep NR AOFAS; Kaikkonen Score
Ng and Das De [34] 2007 NR 20 20:0 23 (19–35) 12 (6–20) Bröstrom–Evans–Gould TD NR Kaikonen
Oloff et al. [36] 2000 Retrospective 10 7:9 34.5 (± 9.26) 9.6 (± 5.44) Capsular shrinkage CS NR AOFAS
Schepers et al. [39] 2011 Retrospective 20 12:8 33.9 (± 11.6) 109.6 (± 64.3) Hemi-Castaing procedure TD NR OMAS; KAFS; VAS; SF-36; Tegner
Ventura et al. [47] 2014 Retrospective 10 7:3 Med 29.4 (25–35) 16.3 (± 8.2) Reconstruction with tendon allograft  (n.s.) TD NR AOFAS; Karlsson, Tegner activity level
Xu et al. [48] 2014 Retrospective 32 18:14 32.4 (± 2.4) 33.5 (± 6.7) Reconstruction with semitendinosis autograft AR NR AOFAS
36 20:16 33.2 (± 3.2) 18.5 (± 6.7) Reconstruction with tendon allograft (n.s.) AR NR AOFAS

NR not reported, Arep anatomic repair, AR anatomic reconstruction, TD tenodesis, CS capsular shrinkage, Med median, n.s. not specified

* NR for the final study inclusion