Table 3.
Score improvement per technique
Technique | Questionnaire | N (patients) | References | Mean pre-op score (SD) | Mean post-op score (SD) | Mean score improvement (SD) | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anatomic repair | AOFAS | 119 | Hu et al. [20] Maffuli et al. [32] |
62.1 (8.0) | 93.8 (2.7) | 31.8 (5.3) | p < 0.0005 |
Kaikkonen | 38 | Maffuli et al. [32] | 45.0 (30–70) | 90.0 (65–100) | 45 (*) | p < 0.001 | |
Karlsson | 121 | Cho et al. [9] Hu et al. [20] |
54.2 (6.3) | 95.1 (3.6) | 40.9 (2.9) | p < 0.0005 | |
Anatomic reconstruction | AOFAS | 128 | Caprio et al. [8] Hua et al. [21] Ibrahim et al. [23] Xu et al. [48] |
53.2 (10.6) | 90.2 (10.9) | 37.0 (6.8) | p < 0.0005 |
Karlsson | 35 | Hua et al. [21] | 38.5 (3.2) | 90.1 (7.8) | 51.6 (*) | p < 0.0005 | |
Tenodesis | AOFAS | 10 | Ventura et al. [47] | 67.0 (15.4) | 86.5 (12) | 19.5 (*) | p < 0.001 |
Kaikkonen | 20 | Ng and Das De [34] | 39.8 (NR) | 89.6 (NR) | 49.8 (*) | NR | |
Karlsson | 39 | Kim et al. [24] Ventura et al. [47] |
56.0 (3.8) | 85.3 (2.5) | 29.4 (6.3) | p < 0.0005 | |
Tegner | 51 | Baray et al. [3] Schepers et al. [39] Ventura et al. [47] |
5.8 (1.4) | 6.6 (2.0) | 0.8 (0.7) | p < 0.0005 |
NR not reported, SD standard deviation
* Could not be calculated/unknown