Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 14;26(7):2183–2195. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4730-4

Table 3.

Score improvement per technique

Technique Questionnaire N (patients) References Mean pre-op score (SD) Mean post-op score (SD) Mean score improvement (SD) p value
Anatomic repair AOFAS 119 Hu et al. [20]
Maffuli et al. [32]
62.1 (8.0) 93.8 (2.7) 31.8 (5.3) p < 0.0005
Kaikkonen 38 Maffuli et al. [32] 45.0 (30–70) 90.0 (65–100) 45 (*) p < 0.001
Karlsson 121 Cho et al. [9]
Hu et al. [20]
54.2 (6.3) 95.1 (3.6) 40.9 (2.9) p < 0.0005
Anatomic reconstruction AOFAS 128 Caprio et al. [8]
Hua et al. [21]
Ibrahim et al. [23]
Xu et al. [48]
53.2 (10.6) 90.2 (10.9) 37.0 (6.8) p < 0.0005
Karlsson 35 Hua et al. [21] 38.5 (3.2) 90.1 (7.8) 51.6 (*) p < 0.0005
Tenodesis AOFAS 10 Ventura et al. [47] 67.0 (15.4) 86.5 (12) 19.5 (*) p < 0.001
Kaikkonen 20 Ng and Das De [34] 39.8 (NR) 89.6 (NR) 49.8 (*) NR
Karlsson 39 Kim et al. [24]
Ventura et al. [47]
56.0 (3.8) 85.3 (2.5) 29.4 (6.3) p < 0.0005
Tegner 51 Baray et al. [3]
Schepers et al. [39]
Ventura et al. [47]
5.8 (1.4) 6.6 (2.0) 0.8 (0.7) p < 0.0005

NR not reported, SD standard deviation

* Could not be calculated/unknown