Table 2.
Clinical scoring systems utilised for treatment of talar OCDs and associated knee scores in case of implantation techniques
Clinical scoring system | No. of studies |
---|---|
AOFAS Ankle/Hindfoot Scale [59] | 43 |
VAS (Visual Analog Scale) [21] | 27 |
Patient Satisfaction Score | 17 |
Tegner score [116] | 3 |
Short Form-36 [131] | 4 |
Hannover score [117] | 3 |
Freiburg Ankle Score [62] | 3 |
Criteria proposed by Berndt and Harty [15] | 3 |
Ogilvie Harris Score [90] | 3 |
Ankle Activity Score [48] | 2 |
Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System [35] | 2 |
Hospital of Special Surgery Patella Score [9] | 2 |
IKDC Subjective and Objective Knee Evaluation Form [51, 86] | 2 |
Clinical evaluation proposed by Shearer and Loomer [109] | 1 |
RTA (Return to Activity) [105] | 1 |
NRS (Numeric Rating Scale for pain and satisfaction) [39, 100] | 1 |
Saxena criteria [105] | 1 |
FAAM (Foot and Ankle Ability Measure) [75] | 1 |
McCullough Score [76] | 1 |
Foot Functioning Index [83] | 1 |
MODEMS AAOS Foot and Ankle Follow-up Questionnaire [82] | 1 |
Modified Cincinnati Knee Documentation Rating [72] | 1 |
Bandi Knee Global Assessment Score [10] | 1 |
Lysholm [71] | 1 |
Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) [49] | 1 |
Some studies utilised >1 scoring system