Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 27;26(7):2142–2157. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4616-5

Table 2.

Clinical scoring systems utilised for treatment of talar OCDs and associated knee scores in case of implantation techniques

Clinical scoring system No. of studies
AOFAS Ankle/Hindfoot Scale [59] 43
VAS (Visual Analog Scale) [21] 27
Patient Satisfaction Score 17
Tegner score [116] 3
Short Form-36 [131] 4
Hannover score [117] 3
Freiburg Ankle Score [62] 3
Criteria proposed by Berndt and Harty [15] 3
Ogilvie Harris Score [90] 3
Ankle Activity Score [48] 2
Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System [35] 2
Hospital of Special Surgery Patella Score [9] 2
IKDC Subjective and Objective Knee Evaluation Form [51, 86] 2
Clinical evaluation proposed by Shearer and Loomer [109] 1
RTA (Return to Activity) [105] 1
NRS (Numeric Rating Scale for pain and satisfaction) [39, 100] 1
Saxena criteria [105] 1
FAAM (Foot and Ankle Ability Measure) [75] 1
McCullough Score [76] 1
Foot Functioning Index [83] 1
MODEMS AAOS Foot and Ankle Follow-up Questionnaire [82] 1
Modified Cincinnati Knee Documentation Rating [72] 1
Bandi Knee Global Assessment Score [10] 1
Lysholm [71] 1
Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) [49] 1

Some studies utilised >1 scoring system