Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 20;12:488. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00488

Table 2.

A comparison of findings in the VFSS and clinical oral intake conditions within and between hemispheric and brainstem groups.

Hemispheric group (n = 11) Brainstem group (n = 6) p1 p2
Before treatment After treatment p Before treatment After treatment p
FDS
Soft diet (median [IQR]) 18.0 (14.0) 12.0 (13.0) 0.120 22.5 (22.25) 11.5 (22.25) 0.043* 0.228 0.613
Thick liquid (median [IQR]) 21.0 (20.0) 16.0 (16.0) 0.066 25.5 (22.5) 29.0 (15.5) 0.463 0.189 0.049*
Thin liquid (median [IQR]) 16.0 (11.0) 12.0 (5.0) 0.012* 23.5 (18.0) 19.5 (27.0) 0.046* 0.288 0.311
Total FDS score (median [IQR]) 63.0 (43.0) 38.0 (30.0) 0.006* 69.5 (66.75) 55.0 (53.0) 0.028* 0.291 0.132
8-point PAS (median [IQR]) 2.0 (4.0) 1.0 (1.0) 0.121 5.5 (4.75) 2.0 (4.25) 0.041* 0.149 0.239
FOIS (median [IQR]) 3.0 (3.0) 7.0 (1.0) 0.003* 1.0 (0.5) 3.5 (3.25) 0.039* 0.070 0.039*

Within-group and between-group comparisons of FDS, 8-point PAS, and FOIS were performed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann-Whitney test. VFSS, videofluoroscopic swallow study; FDS, functional dysphagia scale; PAS, penetration-aspiration scale; FOIS, functional oral intake scale; IQR, interquartile range. p: comparison between before and after treatment in each group; p1, comparison between two groups before treatment; p2, comparison between two groups after treatment.

*

p < 0.05.