Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017 Dec 13;65(8):1871–1884. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2783305

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Comparison of FLIS with DDLS for different dictionary sizes by using a 3-way ANOVA. The intervals represent the 95 percent confidence intervals of dice overlap values for a given configuration of method-class-dictionary size. FLIS is represented in blue and DDLS in red. Values reported for ANOVA across the method factor are d f = 1, F = 7.22, p = .0075. ANOVA values across dictionary length factor are d f =3, F =9.95, p≪.01. We also performed a repeated ANOVA across dictionary size factor for the two methods which reported a p–value=1.73×10−10, which confirms that dictionary size has a significant role.