Table 2.
Exp | Cont | 2′ K+ | 3′ K+ | 2′K+/EGTA | 3′K+/EGTA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0 (20) | 20 (20) | |||
2 | 0 (31) | 0 (16) | |||
3 | 0 (22) | 83 (18) | |||
4 | 0 (20) | 32 (28) | 110 (20) | ||
5 | 0 (20) | 15 (20) | 0 (20) | ||
6 | 0 (20) | 31 (16) | 65 (17) | 0 (20) | |
7 | 0 (20) | 74 (23) | 0 (20) | ||
Mean ± SEM | 0 | 30 ± 12 | 83 ± 14 | 0 |
Statistical analysis by ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test: 3′ K+ is significant over other conditions (P < 0.0005 vs. cont; P < 0.05 vs. 2′K+; P < 0.005 vs. 3′ K/EGTA). 2′ K+ is barely significant over control (P < 0.1). Other multiple comparisons are all non-significant
(n) number of somas examined