Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 27;19:127. doi: 10.1186/s12881-018-0638-1

Table 3.

Allelic and genotypic distribution of G894 T eNOS polymorphism among cases and controls

N = 145 N = 184
Cases N(%) Controls N(%) OR [95% CI] P value (< 0.05)
Genotypes GG 5 (3.49%) 116 (63,04) 1
GT 54 (37.24%) 62 (33,69) 20.2 [7.7–52.4] < 0.0001*
TT 86 (59.27%) 6 (3,27) 332.5 [98.2–1125.4] < 0.0001*
Dominant model GG + GT 59 (40.73%) 178 (96,73) 1
TT 86 (59.27%) 6 (3,27) 43.2 [17.9–104.09] < 0.0001*
Recessive model GG 5 (3.49%) 116 (63,04) 1
GT + TT 140 (96.51%) 68 (36,96) 47.7 [18.6–122.3] <  0.0001*
Additive model G 64 (22.07%) 294 (79,89) 1
T 226 (77.93%) 74 (20,11) 14.02 [9.6–20.45] <  0.0001*

*Statistically significant; GG Homozygous wild type, GT Heterozygous, TT Homozygous mutant