Table 4.
Multivariate logistic regression in boys
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | P value | Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | P value | Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | P value | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 0.90 (0.72–1.12) | 0.349 | ||||
| rs2239669 | 0.182 | |||||
| TT | 0.21 (0.02–2.10) | 0.22 (0.22–2.22) | 0.199 | |||
| CT, CC | 1 | 1 | ||||
| rs12441827 | 0.018 | 0.016 | 0.002 | |||
| TT | 3.95 (1.27–12.32) | 4.03 (1.30–12.48) | 5.33 (1.84–15.46) | |||
| TC, CC | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
The odds ratio was adjusted for body mass index, rs12441827, rs2239669, and rs6576457
Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, χ2 = 9.877, p = 0.274
Nagelkerke’s R2 in model 1 = 0.238, model 2 = 0.223, model 3 = 0.188