Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 25;17(4):209–219. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elx025

Table 2.

Comparison of scRNA-seq platforms

Characteristic FACS Microfluidics (e.g. Fluidigm C1TM) Droplets (DropSeq, InDrop, ChromiumTM, etc.)
Reaction volume Microliter Nanoliter Nanoliter
Throughput Low to medium (depends on level of automatization of RT, amplification and library preparation processes) Low to medium (depends on chip design) High (limited by number of distinct cell barcodes)
Flexibility Great flexibility to choose methods for RT, amplification and library preparation Some flexibility to choose methods for RT, amplification and library preparation Only molecule counting (no full-length transcript coverage)
Additional measurements Additional data from index sorting (size, granularity, expression of surface markers, DNA content, etc.) Imaging of the captured cells before lysis None